Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1442126
| From | Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: led: is31fl319x: 1/3/6/9-channel light effect led driver |
| Date | 2016-07-13 09:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rUn5E-8pO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rSK6l-JU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSK6l-JU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUcjU-1np-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUlGy-7CR-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Nikolaus, On 07/13/2016 08:09 AM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: [...] >>> + /* >>> + * Kernel conventions require per-LED led-max-microamp property. >>> + * But the chip does not allow to limit individual LEDs. >>> + * So we take minimum from all subnodes. >> >> Why minimum? Choose maximum and reduce max_brightness properties >> of the sub-LEDs with lesser led-max-microamp. > > Hm. Is this really the correct way to handle it? > > Assume you connect an LED which is specified with 10mA peak current. > And another with 20mA peak current. > > So you define led-max-microamp in the DT as 10 mA and 20 mA. > > Firstly a user can set the brightness only to 50% of LED_FULL since it is limited > by a reduced max_brightness. And heshe finds that not all LEDs have the same > max_brightness. The first LED will have 127 and the second one 255 for reasons > not directly understandable. You have to know that led-max-microamp property was introduced to standarize Device Tree definition of maximum brightness allowed for a sub-LED. Earlier people defined max-brightness property in DT, but at some point we realized that brightness level is not a proper unit for describing a hardware property. It was not global max-microamp setting that appears in recent LED controllers that drove the introduction of led-max-microamp property. If you question the idea of having different maximum brightness per sub-LEDs controlled by the same device, then it means that you have objections to the entire idea of LED subsystem max_brightness property, whereas it has been broadly accepted and successfully used for years. > This entangles "brightness" with "max-current" - which are IMHO two independent > things. The fact that recent LED controllers use the same notion for one of its settings shouldn't mislead us. > Next, this will set the hardware limit to 20 mA. So there will be current peaks > of 20 mA for an LED where the DT developer thinks to have specified a led-max-microamp > of 10 mA. So you run the LED outside of its specs although the DT seems to > tell that it is inside and user-space thinks it is ok. This will reduce lifetime of LEDs. In what circumstances would such current peaks occur? On reset? Shouldn't such a device be considered as broken by design? What if all LEDs would have low amperage? Would there be some way to protect them from being damaged by current peaks? > So either "led-max-microamp" is the wrong name for this property (could better > be "led-max-average-microamp") or the whole logic is broken. > > This is why we hesitate to hide (or even disable because you can't set the limit > to 10mA by DT) the current limiting chip feature by such a difficult to understand > automatic feature. > > Using the minimum of all led-max-microamp keeps everything on the safe > side, running some LEDs with less current than specified. But never outside > of the spec. And all LEDs have the same max_brightness which is IMHO > more intuitive for the user. > > Our original proposal was to define led-max-microamp for the whole chip > instead of individual LEDs, which is IMHO much easier to understand, > because it corresponds one-to-one with the data sheet. -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: led: is31fl319x: 1/3/6/9-channel light effect led driver Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: led: is31fl319x: 1/3/6/9-channel light effect led driver "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com> - 2016-07-13 08:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: led: is31fl319x: 1/3/6/9-channel light effect led driver Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2016-07-13 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: led: is31fl319x: 1/3/6/9-channel light effect led driver "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com> - 2016-07-13 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: led: is31fl319x: 1/3/6/9-channel light effect led driver Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2016-07-13 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: led: is31fl319x: 1/3/6/9-channel light effect led driver "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com> - 2016-07-13 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: led: is31fl319x: 1/3/6/9-channel light effect led driver "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com> - 2016-07-15 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: led: is31fl319x: 1/3/6/9-channel light effect led driver Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2016-07-19 09:00 +0200
csiph-web