Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1441995
| From | Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 0/2] ipc/sem.c: sem_lock fixes |
| Date | 2016-07-13 07:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rUkAN-6XH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Andrew, Hi Peter,
next version of the sem_lock() fixes:
The patches are again vs. tip.
Patch 1 is ready for merging, Patch 2 is for review.
- Patch 1 is the patch as in -next since January
It fixes the race that was found by Felix.
- Patch 2 removes the memory barriers that are part of the qspinlock
code.
- (The hysteresis patch would be patch 3. The risk of regressions
can't be ruled out, thus it must wait for benchmarks from real
workload tests)
Patch 1+2 were one patch, I've split patches so that review and
backporting are simpler.
--
Manfred
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/2] ipc/sem.c: sem_lock fixes Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> - 2016-07-13 07:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/2] ipc/sem.c: sem_lock fixes Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-07-14 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/2] ipc/sem.c: sem_lock fixes Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> - 2016-07-14 18:50 +0200
csiph-web