Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1441966

Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in dequeue_task_fair

Show all headers | View raw

2016-07-13 9:58 GMT+08:00 Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>:
> On 2016/07/13 at 09:50, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> 2016-07-13 1:25 GMT+08:00  <bsegall@google.com>:
>>> Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 11.07.2016 15:12, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>>>>> On 2016/07/11 at 17:54, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Konstantin, Xunlei,
>>>>>> 2016-07-11 16:42 GMT+08:00 Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>:
>>>>>>> On 2016/07/11 at 16:22, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2016/07/11 at 15:25, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 2016-06-16 20:57 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>:
>>>>>>>>>> Hierarchy could be already throttled at this point. Throttled next
>>>>>>>>>> buddy could trigger null pointer dereference in pick_next_task_fair().
>>>>>>>>> There is cfs_rq->next check in pick_next_entity(), so how can null
>>>>>>>>> pointer dereference happen?
>>>>>>>> I guess it's the following code leading to a NULL se returned:
>>>>>>> s/NULL/empty-entity cfs_rq se/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> pick_next_entity():
>>>>>>>>      if (cfs_rq->next && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->next, left) < 1)
>>>>>>              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>>> I think this will return false.
>>>>> With the wrong throttled_hierarchy(), I think this can happen. But after we have the
>>>>> corrected throttled_hierarchy() patch, I can't see how it is possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> dequeue_task_fair():
>>>>>      if (task_sleep && parent_entity(se))
>>>>>          set_next_buddy(parent_entity(se));
>>>>>
>>>>> How does dequeue_task_fair() with DEQUEUE_SLEEP set(true task_sleep) happen to a throttled hierarchy?
>>>>> IOW, a task belongs to a throttled hierarchy is running?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe Konstantin knows the reason.
>>>> This function (dequeue_task_fair) check throttling but at point it could skip several
>>>> levels and announce as next buddy actually throttled entry.
>>>> Probably this bug hadn't happened but this's really hard to prove that this is impossible.
>>>> ->set_curr_task(), PI-boost or some tricky migration in balancer could break this easily.
>>> sched_setscheduler can call put_prev_task, which then can cause a
>>> throttle outside of __schedule(), then the task blocks normally and
>>> deactivate_task(DEQUEUE_SLEEP) happens and you lose.
>> The cfs_rq_throttled() check in dequeue_task_fair() will capture the
>> cfs_rq which is throttled in sched_setscheduler::put_prev_task path,
>> so nothing lost, where I miss?
>
> cfs_rq_throttled() returns false for child cgroups in the throttled hierarchy, so
> throttled_hierarchy() should be relied on in such cases.

Yes, so what's lost in bsegall's reply?

Regards,
Wanpeng Li

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in dequeue_task_fair Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 09:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in  dequeue_task_fair Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2016-07-11 10:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in  dequeue_task_fair Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com> - 2016-07-11 10:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in  dequeue_task_fair Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com> - 2016-07-11 10:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in dequeue_task_fair Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 12:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in  dequeue_task_fair Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com> - 2016-07-11 14:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in  dequeue_task_fair Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2016-07-11 14:30 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in dequeue_task_fair bsegall@google.com - 2016-07-12 19:30 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in dequeue_task_fair Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 04:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in  dequeue_task_fair Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com> - 2016-07-13 04:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in dequeue_task_fair Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 04:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in dequeue_task_fair bsegall@google.com - 2016-07-13 19:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in dequeue_task_fair Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 14:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in dequeue_task_fair bsegall@google.com - 2016-07-14 20:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in dequeue_task_fair Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 00:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in dequeue_task_fair bsegall@google.com - 2016-07-15 00:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in dequeue_task_fair Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 01:10 +0200

csiph-web