Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1441955
| From | Andrey Utkin <andrey_utkin@fastmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4] [media] pci: Add tw5864 driver |
| Date | 2016-07-13 04:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rUhCV-4Fk-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rTLa2-hv-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTMz7-1cS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:40:53AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > Each of these blocks will start with the dev_<level> prefix > and the subsequent lines will not have the same prefix Yes. I have checked how it looks before submitting, but I didn't see this as a problem. I don't mind changing that (anyway I have found few micro-issues with checkpatch --strict and would like to resubmit), but would like to hear some second opinion. > It also might be better to issue something like a single > line dev_warn referring to the driver code and just leave > this comment in the driver sources. > > Something like: > > dev_warn(&pci_dev->dev, > "This driver has known defects in video quality\n"); Things get complicated if you consider mainstream distros and their years-behind kernels. The simplest way to preserve correspondence between state of driver and such notice is to contain the notice in the compiled driver. I hope the state of affairs will change to better someday :)
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4] [media] pci: Add tw5864 driver Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-07-11 18:50 +0200 Re: [PATCH v4] [media] pci: Add tw5864 driver Andrey Utkin <andrey_utkin@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-13 04:00 +0200
csiph-web