Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1441417
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: Make wake_up_nohz_cpu() handle CPUs going offline |
| Date | 2016-07-12 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rU6Rd-66R-61@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rPOpP-47C-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rPTIS-7oq-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 01:29:59AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > void wake_up_nohz_cpu(int cpu)
> > {
> > - if (!wake_up_full_nohz_cpu(cpu))
> > + if (cpu_online(cpu) && !wake_up_full_nohz_cpu(cpu))
>
> So at this point, as we passed CPU_DYING, I believe the CPU isn't visible in the domains
> anymore (correct me if I'm wrong),
So rebuilding the domains is an utter trainwreck atm. But I suspect
that's wrong. Esp. with cpusets enabled we rebuild the domains very late
from a workqueue.
That is why the scheduler has cpu_active_mask to constrain the domains
during hotplug.
Now I need to go sort through that trainwreck because deadline needs it,
but I've not had the opportunity :/
> therefore get_nohz_timer_target() can't return it,
> unless smp_processor_id() is the only alternative.
With the below that should be true I think.
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 6c0cdb5a73f8..b35cacbe9b9e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ int get_nohz_timer_target(void)
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
- for_each_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
+ for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), cpu_active_mask) {
if (!idle_cpu(i) && is_housekeeping_cpu(cpu)) {
cpu = i;
goto unlock;
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: Make wake_up_nohz_cpu() handle CPUs going offline Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-12 16:30 +0200
csiph-web