Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1441317
| From | Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 07/13] pci: Provide sensible irq vector alloc/free routines |
| Date | 2016-07-12 14:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rU5ip-4W1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <rR7JN-3ot-49@gated-at.bofh.it> <rRQ49-6FO-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTdUK-3GE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTGN4-5On-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <rU21c-2W2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:13:00AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:43:41PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > > > I diagreed - if we deprecated functions the only thing that should > > > be mentioned is a "don't use these". > > > > I will try to paraphrase myself. The new API deprecates pci_enable_msi*_range > > functions, but I am not that sure about others. Certainly, pci_msi*_vec__ount > > and pci_enable_msi*_exact could have (and AFAIR do have) uses that can not be > > covered by automatic initialization of pci_alloc_irq_vectors(). > > pci_enable_msi*_exact is the equivalent of pci_enable_msi*_range > with minvecs == maxvecs and treating any return value >= 0 as 0. Right. And people asked explicitly to introduce these helpers when range functions were introduced in the first place. Since there is handful of drivers that do use pci_enable_msi*_exact() I suppose a need for them persists. > I've updated the documentation so that the old usage examples are kept > around, but now use pci_alloc_irq_vectors. I've also added a more detaild > blurb on pci_msi*_vec_count - I think there is no need for them, but > if I'm proven wrong we'll have to add a pci_irq_vector_count that handles > all interrupt types later. I guess, it is up to Bjorn. But. Your proposed pci_nr_irq_vectors() function (a) is not a replacement for pci_msi*_vec_count() and (b) would be useless if I read its description properly: (a) Functions pci_msi*_vec_count() return number of vectors reported by a PCI device. It is a constant for the device and a driver may make an assumption based on this number; (b) A number returned by pci_nr_irq_vectors() is not guaranteed what a following call to pci_alloc_irq_vectors() can return (since the number of actually allocated vectors might change between the two calls). Therefore, a value returned by pci_nr_irq_vectors() can not be used for anything.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 07/13] pci: Provide sensible irq vector alloc/free routines Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2016-07-10 05:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 07/13] pci: Provide sensible irq vector alloc/free routines Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com> - 2016-07-11 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 07/13] pci: Provide sensible irq vector alloc/free routines Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2016-07-12 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 07/13] pci: Provide sensible irq vector alloc/free routines Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com> - 2016-07-12 14:50 +0200
csiph-web