Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1440031
| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Odd performance results |
| Date | 2016-07-10 06:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rTexs-4cA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello! So I ran a quick benchmark which showed stair-step results. I immediately thought "Ah, this is due to CPU 0 and 1, 2 and 3, 4 and 5, and 6 and 7 being threads in a core." Then I thought "Wait, this is an x86!" Then I dumped out cpu*/topology/thread_siblings_list, getting the following: cpu0/topology/thread_siblings_list: 0-1 cpu1/topology/thread_siblings_list: 0-1 cpu2/topology/thread_siblings_list: 2-3 cpu3/topology/thread_siblings_list: 2-3 cpu4/topology/thread_siblings_list: 4-5 cpu5/topology/thread_siblings_list: 4-5 cpu6/topology/thread_siblings_list: 6-7 cpu7/topology/thread_siblings_list: 6-7 Is this now expected behavior or a fluke of my particular laptop? Here is hoping for expected behavior, as it makes NUMA locality the default for a great many workloads. Enlightenment? Thanx, Paul
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Odd performance results "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-07-10 06:30 +0200
Re: Odd performance results Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-10 07:20 +0200
Re: Odd performance results "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-07-10 16:50 +0200
Re: Odd performance results Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-12 17:00 +0200
Re: Odd performance results "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-07-12 17:10 +0200
Re: Odd performance results "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-07-12 20:00 +0200
Re: Odd performance results "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-07-12 20:30 +0200
Re: Odd performance results Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-12 21:00 +0200
Re: [CRM114spam]: Re: Odd performance results "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dave@treblig.org> - 2016-07-12 21:40 +0200
Re: [CRM114spam]: Re: Odd performance results "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-07-12 22:10 +0200
Re: [CRM114spam]: Re: Odd performance results Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-07-13 09:30 +0200
Re: Odd performance results Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-07-13 09:20 +0200
Re: Odd performance results Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> - 2016-07-13 14:40 +0200
Re: Odd performance results Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-13 14:40 +0200
Re: Odd performance results "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-07-13 16:10 +0200
csiph-web