Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1440990
| From | Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] vfs: check i_count under lock in evict_inodes |
| Date | 2016-07-12 02:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rTU3E-607-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rTTKh-5SH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 05:15:04PM -0700, Chunwei Chen wrote: > We need to check i_count again with i_lock held, because iput might re-add > i_count when lazytime is on. Without this check, we could end up with > double-free or use-after-free. Details, please. Ideally - with a reproducer. Who is calling that iput() at that point of generic_shutdown_super() (has to be another thread) and just what will happen if the same iput() is delayed until *after* evict_inodes(), all the way into ->put_super(). At which point there's no promise whatsoever that the data structures used by ->evict_inode() hadn't been already freed...
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] vfs: check i_count under lock in evict_inodes Chunwei Chen <david.chen@osnexus.com> - 2016-07-12 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] vfs: check i_count under lock in evict_inodes Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-07-12 02:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] vfs: check i_count under lock in evict_inodes David Chen <david.chen@osnexus.com> - 2016-07-12 03:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] vfs: check i_count under lock in evict_inodes Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-07-12 03:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] vfs: check i_count under lock in evict_inodes Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-07-12 07:30 +0200
csiph-web