Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1440944
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: Give up balancing node for high order allocations earlier |
| Date | 2016-07-12 00:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rTRS9-4H4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rPgxQ-ak-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 13:42:12 +0800 "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: > To avoid excessive reclaim, we give up rebalancing for high order > allocations right after reclaiming enough pages. hm. What are the observed runtime effects of this change? Any testing results?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: Give up balancing node for high order allocations earlier Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-07-12 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: Give up balancing node for high order allocations earlier "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2016-07-12 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: Give up balancing node for high order allocations earlier Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2016-07-12 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: Give up balancing node for high order allocations earlier "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2016-07-12 10:50 +0200
csiph-web