Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1440680
| From | Matthias Dahl <ml_linux-kernel@binary-island.eu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [dm-devel] [4.7.0rc6] Page Allocation Failures with dm-crypt |
| Date | 2016-07-11 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rTKH1-8jQ-41@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rT0NP-3Iq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTEUW-4zH-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTJhT-7vn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTJBf-7EI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello Mike... On 2016-07-11 15:30, Mike Snitzer wrote: > But that is expected given you're doing an unbounded buffered write to > the device. What isn't expected, to me anyway, is that the mm > subsystem > (or the default knobs for buffered writeback) would be so aggressive > about delaying writeback. Ok. But, and please correct me if I am wrong, I was under the impression that only the file caches/buffers were affected, iow, if I use free to monitor the memory usage, the used memory increases to the point where it consumes all memory, not the buffers/file caches... that is what I am seeing here. Also, if I use dd directly on the device w/o dm-crypt in-between, there is no problem. Sure, buffers increase hugely also... but only those. > Why are you doing this test anyway? Such a large buffered write > doesn't > seem to accurately model any application I'm aware of (but obviously it > should still "work"). It is not a test per se. I simply wanted to fill the partition with noise. And doing it this way is faster than using urandom or anything. ;-) That is why I stumbled over this issue in the first place. > Now that is weird. Are you (or the distro you're using) setting any mm > subsystem tunables to really broken values? You can see those in my initial mail. I attached the kernel warnings, all sysctl tunables and more. Maybe that helps. > What is your raid10's full stripesize? 4 disks in RAID10, with a stripe size of 64k. > Is your dd IO size of 512K somehow triggering excess R-M-W cycles which > is exacerbating the problem? The partitions are properly aligned. And as you can see, with that stripe size, there is no issue. In the meantime I did some further tests: I created an ext2 on the partition as well as a 60GiB container image on it. I used that image with dm-crypt, same parameters as before. No matter what I do here, I cannot trigger the same behavior. Maybe it is an interaction issue between dm-crypt and the s/w RAID. But at this point, I have no idea how to further diagnose/test it. If you can point me in any direction that would be great... With Kind Regards from Germany Matthias -- Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Matthias Dahl | Software Engineer | binary-island.eu services: custom software [desktop, mobile, web], server administration
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [4.7.0rc6] Page Allocation Failures with dm-crypt Matthias Dahl <ml_linux-kernel@binary-island.eu> - 2016-07-11 10:40 +0200
Re: [4.7.0rc6] Page Allocation Failures with dm-crypt Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> - 2016-07-11 15:20 +0200
Re: [dm-devel] [4.7.0rc6] Page Allocation Failures with dm-crypt Matthias Dahl <ml_linux-kernel@binary-island.eu> - 2016-07-11 15:30 +0200
Re: [4.7.0rc6] Page Allocation Failures with dm-crypt Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> - 2016-07-11 15:50 +0200
Re: [4.7.0rc6] Page Allocation Failures with dm-crypt Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> - 2016-07-11 15:40 +0200
Re: [dm-devel] [4.7.0rc6] Page Allocation Failures with dm-crypt Matthias Dahl <ml_linux-kernel@binary-island.eu> - 2016-07-11 16:50 +0200
Re: [dm-devel] [4.7.0rc6] Page Allocation Failures with dm-crypt Matthias Dahl <ml_linux-kernel@binary-island.eu> - 2016-07-12 10:10 +0200
csiph-web