Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1440610
| From | Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] soc: mediatek: Refine scpsys to support multiple platform |
| Date | 2016-07-11 15:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rTJhT-7vn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <rzn0B-59c-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rQw7w-5PD-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rRNJ0-563-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSfFf-6fa-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTFeh-4Gw-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11/07/16 10:56, James Liao wrote:
[...]
>>>>> @@ -467,28 +386,54 @@ static int scpsys_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>> if (PTR_ERR(scpd->supply) == -ENODEV)
>>>>> scpd->supply = NULL;
>>>>> else
>>>>> - return PTR_ERR(scpd->supply);
>>>>> + return ERR_CAST(scpd->supply);
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> - pd_data->num_domains = NUM_DOMAINS;
>>>>> + pd_data->num_domains = num;
>>>>>
>>>>> - for (i = 0; i < NUM_DOMAINS; i++) {
>>>>> + init_clks(pdev, clk);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>>>>> struct scp_domain *scpd = &scp->domains[i];
>>>>> struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = &scpd->genpd;
>>>>> const struct scp_domain_data *data = &scp_domain_data[i];
>>>>>
>>>>> + for (j = 0; j < MAX_CLKS && data->clk_id[j]; j++) {
>>>>> + struct clk *c = clk[data->clk_id[j]];
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(c)) {
>>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: clk unavailable\n",
>>>>> + data->name);
>>>>> + return ERR_CAST(c);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + scpd->clk[j] = c;
>>>>
>>>> Put this in the else branch. Apart from that is there any reason you
>>>
>>> Do you mean to change like this?
>>>
>>> if (IS_ERR(c)) {
>>> ...
>>> return ERR_CAST(c);
>>> } else {
>>> scpd->clk[j] = c;
>>> }
>>>
>>> checkpatch.pl will warn for above code due to it returns in 'if' branch.
>>>
>>
>> I tried that on top of next-20160706 and it checkpatch didn't throw any
>> warning. Which kernel version are based on?
>
> I don't remember which version of checkpatch warn on this pattern. This
> patch series develop across several kernel versions.
We as the kernel community develop against master or linux-next. We only
care about older kernel version in the sense that we intent hard not to
break any userspace/kernel or firmware/kernel interfaces. Apart from
that it's up to every individual to backport patches from mainline
kernel to his respective version. But that's nothing the community as a
hole can take care of.
>
> So do you prefer to put "scpd->clk[j] = c;" into 'else' branch?
>
Yes please :)
>>>> moved the for up in the function? If not, I would prefer not to move it,
>>>> to make it easier to read the diff.
>>>
>>> The new 'for' block are far different from original one. And I think
>>> it's easy to read if we keep simple assign statements in the same block.
>>>
>>
>> It's different in the sense that it checks if struct clk *c is an error.
>> I don't see the reason why we need to move it up in the file.
>> It's not too important but I would prefer not to move it if there is no
>> reason.
>
> I think I may misunderstand your comments. Which 'for' block did you
> mention for? 'for (i = 0; i < num ...' or 'for (j = 0; j < MAX_CLKS
> && ...' ?
>
> The 'for(i)' exists in original code, this patch just change its counter
> from 'NUM_DOMAINS' to 'num'. The 'for(j)' is a new for-block, so it was
> not moved from other blocks.
>
for (j = 0; j < MAX_CLKS... is present in the actual scpsys_probe in
linux-next (line 485 as of today). This patch moves this for a few lines
up, to be precise before executing this code sequence:
<code>
pd_data->domains[i] = genpd;
scpd->scp = scp;
scpd->data = data;
</code>
AFAIK there is no reason to do so. It adds unnecessary complexity to the
patch. So please fix this together with the other comments you got.
Thanks a lot,
Matthias
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] soc: mediatek: Refine scpsys to support multiple platform James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> - 2016-07-11 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] soc: mediatek: Refine scpsys to support multiple platform Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] soc: mediatek: Refine scpsys to support multiple platform Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com> - 2016-07-12 04:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] soc: mediatek: Refine scpsys to support multiple platform James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com> - 2016-07-12 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] soc: mediatek: Refine scpsys to support multiple platform Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 10:30 +0200
csiph-web