Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1440337

Re: [PATCH v3] sched/deadline: remove useless param from setup_new_dl_entity

From luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3] sched/deadline: remove useless param from setup_new_dl_entity
Date 2016-07-11 10:10 +0200
Message-ID <rTErT-4nS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rSC8N-45T-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTBDH-2Ct-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization university of trento

Show all headers | View raw


Hello,

On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:03:56 +0800
Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 2016/07/08 at 19:28, Juri Lelli wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -363,6 +364,15 @@ static inline void setup_new_dl_entity(struct
> > sched_dl_entity *dl_se, return;
> >  
> >  	/*
> > +	 * Use the scheduling parameters of the top pi-waiter task,
> > +	 * if we have one from which we can inherit a deadline.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (dl_se->dl_boosted &&
> > +	    (pi_task = rt_mutex_get_top_task(dl_task_of(dl_se))) &&
> > +	    dl_prio(pi_task->normal_prio))
> > +		pi_se = &pi_task->dl;
> > +
> > +	/*
> >  	 * We use the regular wall clock time to set deadlines in
> > the
> >  	 * future; in fact, we must consider execution overheads
> > (time
> >  	 * spent on hardirq context, etc.).
> > @@ -1721,7 +1731,7 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq,
> > struct task_struct *p) static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq,
> > struct task_struct *p) {
> >  	if (dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline, rq_clock(rq)))
> > -		setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl, &p->dl);
> > +		setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl);  
> 
> I'm curious why we even call setup_new_dl_entity() for non-queued
> cases? It seems more reasonable to do it when it really gets queued.
> We can see that enqueue_task_dl()->update_dl_entity() also has the
> same update logic as switched_to_dl().

I wondered the same when removing the dl_new field from
sched_dl_entity... But then I realised that enqueue_dl_entity() does
not always invoke update_dl_entity() or replenish_dl_entity()... For
example, when a task switches from SCHED_OTHER (or RT) to -deadline due
to sched_setattr() (or similar) these functions are not invoked.


				Luca

> If so, for already queued and boosted cases, rt_mutex_setprio() will
> call enqueue_task() with ENQUEUE_REPLENISH set, so enqueue_dl_entity()
> ->replenish_dl_entity() will advance p->dl.deadline beforehand, see
> code: replenish_dl_entity():
>     if (dl_se->dl_deadline == 0) {
>         dl_se->deadline = rq_clock(rq) + pi_se->dl_deadline;
>         dl_se->runtime = pi_se->dl_runtime;
>     }
> 
> IOW, we don't need to handle !dl boosted cases in
> setup_new_dl_entity().
> 
> Regards,
> Xunlei
> 
> >  
> >  	if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) {
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP  
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v3] sched/deadline: remove useless param from setup_new_dl_entity Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-07-08 13:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3] sched/deadline: remove useless param from  setup_new_dl_entity Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com> - 2016-07-11 07:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3] sched/deadline: remove useless param from  setup_new_dl_entity luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> - 2016-07-11 10:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3] sched/deadline: remove useless param from  setup_new_dl_entity Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com> - 2016-07-11 10:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3] sched/deadline: remove useless param from  setup_new_dl_entity luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> - 2016-07-11 11:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3] sched/deadline: remove useless param from  setup_new_dl_entity Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-07-12 10:50 +0200

csiph-web