Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1439757
| From | Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual |
| Date | 2016-07-08 21:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rSJDj-zx-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rQCZj-1uM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSs9r-5Q4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSyox-1CN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSJDj-zx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 07/08/16 12:20, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 07/08/16 00:26, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 10:15 , David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>>>
>
> < snip >
>
>>> Given that we're going to need new code to support this new connector
>>> model, I think we should also fix some of the uglies in the current
>>> overlay format while we're at it.
>>>
>>
>> We need to keep compatibility with the old format. There are 5 million
>> RPIs sold, half a million beaglebones and C.H.I.P. is coming out too.
>> They all use overlays in one form or another.
>>
>> That’s not counting all the custom boards that actively use them.
>>
>> We have a user base now.
>
> Please not that I AM NOT suggesting the we remove compatibility with
^^^ note
> the old format!!!
>
> But I need to push back on the idea that we have a user base that we
> need to keep compatibility with. If I understand correctly, that
> user base is based on using much code that is not in mainline, including
> an altered dtc and a cape manager.
>
> People using out of tree code can not use the fact that code exists and
> is being widely used to force us to mainline that out of tree code.
> That is the risk of using out of tree code.
>
> I do not want to start a big discussion about this now since there is
> no plan to remove the compatibility at this point.
>
> -Frank
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual frowand.list@gmail.com - 2016-07-03 02:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 08:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-07-04 17:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 20:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com> - 2016-07-05 20:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 19:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> - 2016-07-08 02:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> - 2016-07-08 09:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> - 2016-07-08 09:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 21:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 21:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 21:30 +0200
csiph-web