Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1439757

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual

From Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual
Date 2016-07-08 21:30 +0200
Message-ID <rSJDj-zx-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rQCZj-1uM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSs9r-5Q4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSyox-1CN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSJDj-zx-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 07/08/16 12:20, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 07/08/16 00:26, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 10:15 , David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>>>
> 
> < snip >
> 
>>> Given that we're going to need new code to support this new connector
>>> model, I think we should also fix some of the uglies in the current
>>> overlay format while we're at it.
>>>
>>
>> We need to keep compatibility with the old format. There are 5 million
>> RPIs sold, half a million beaglebones and C.H.I.P. is coming out too.
>> They all use overlays in one form or another.
>>
>> That’s not counting all the custom boards that actively use them.
>>
>> We have a user base now.
> 
> Please not that I AM NOT suggesting the we remove compatibility with
         ^^^ note

> the old format!!!
> 
> But I need to push back on the idea that we have a user base that we
> need to keep compatibility with.  If I understand correctly, that
> user base is based on using much code that is not in mainline, including
> an altered dtc and a cape manager.
> 
> People using out of tree code can not use the fact that code exists and
> is being widely used to force us to mainline that out of tree code.
> That is the risk of using out of tree code.
> 
> I do not want to start a big discussion about this now since there is
> no plan to remove the compatibility at this point.
> 
> -Frank
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual frowand.list@gmail.com - 2016-07-03 02:00 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 08:10 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-07-04 17:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 20:20 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com> - 2016-07-05 20:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 19:50 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> - 2016-07-08 02:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> - 2016-07-08 09:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> - 2016-07-08 09:50 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 21:30 +0200
        Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 21:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 21:30 +0200

csiph-web