Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1439705
| From | Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | of_clk_add_(hw_)providers multipule times for one node? |
| Date | 2016-07-08 19:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rSHLb-7Oc-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi. I think the current code allows to add clk_providers multiple times against one DT node. Are there cases that really need to do so? I am thinking the behavior of __of_clk_get_from_provider() is strange. The result of __of_clk_get_from_provider() has three patterns: [1] success [2] return -EPROBE_DEFER [3] return -EINVAL (if clkspec == NULL) [3] is a rare case. So, almost all error cases are treated as -EPROBE_DEFER. A strange scenario ------------------ If a too big clock index is passed in clkspec, of_clk_src_onecell_get() returns -EINVAL. This is reasonable. But, __of_clk_get_from_provider() tries to search next nodes despite that it has already failed to get a clk. Then, it reaches the end of list_for_each_entry() loop, and returns -EPROBE_DEFER. This is not deferred probe at all! In this case, __of_clk_get_from_provider() should return -EINVAL. If this is a bug, I am happy to volunteer to fix it. Thanks. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
of_clk_add_(hw_)providers multipule times for one node? Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-07-08 19:30 +0200
csiph-web