Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1439594

Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage

From Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage
Date 2016-07-08 17:50 +0200
Message-ID <rSGcp-6ES-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rJSFP-2Rh-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJSFQ-2Rh-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:13:20AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> The continuous PWM voltage regulator is caching the voltage value in
> the ->volt_uV field. While most of the time this value should reflect the
> real voltage, sometime it can be sightly different if the PWM device
> rounded the set_duty_cycle request.
> Moreover, this value is not valid until someone has modified the regulator
> output.
> 
> Remove the ->volt_uV field and always rely on the PWM state to calculate
> the regulator output.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> ---
> Mark,
> 
> I know you already added your Tested-by/Acked-by tags on this patch
> but this version has slightly change and is now making use of the
> pwm_get_relative_duty_cycle() helper instead of manually converting
> the absolute duty_cycle value into a relative one.
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
> index 2000118..80d083f 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
> @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ struct pwm_regulator_data {
>  	struct regulator_ops ops;
>  
>  	int state;
> -
> -	/* Continuous voltage */
> -	int volt_uV;
>  };
>  
>  struct pwm_voltages {
> @@ -135,8 +132,13 @@ static int pwm_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *dev)
>  static int pwm_regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>  {
>  	struct pwm_regulator_data *drvdata = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +	int min_uV = rdev->constraints->min_uV;
> +	int diff = rdev->constraints->max_uV - min_uV;
> +	struct pwm_state pstate;
>  
> -	return drvdata->volt_uV;
> +	pwm_get_state(drvdata->pwm, &pstate);
> +
> +	return min_uV + pwm_get_relative_duty_cycle(&pstate, diff);
>  }
>  
>  static int pwm_regulator_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> @@ -162,8 +164,6 @@ static int pwm_regulator_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	drvdata->volt_uV = min_uV;
> -
>  	/* Delay required by PWM regulator to settle to the new voltage */
>  	usleep_range(ramp_delay, ramp_delay + 1000);
>  

This hunk has a minor conflict with the regulator tree and the commit
830583004e61 ("regulator: pwm: Drop unneeded pwm_enable() call") that
it contains.

Mark, do you want me to provide a stable branch with the PWM regulator
patches and resolve that conflict in your tree? Or would you rather take
the whole set based on a stable branch from the PWM tree? Or maybe yet
another possibility would be to base the PWM tree on a stable branch
from the regulator tree containing the above commit.

Or we can let Linus sort out the conflict, it's really quite trivial.

Thierry

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 17:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-07-09 11:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 09:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-07-11 09:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage Doug Anderson <dianders@google.com> - 2016-07-11 19:00 +0200

csiph-web