Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1436591
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Subject: PROBLEM: CPU accounting/scheduling regression in v4.6 CPU scheduling patchset? |
| Date | 2016-07-04 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rRiYx-1RA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rQTns-31g-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, 3 Jul 2016, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> Since updating my PC to Linux 4.6, I noticed the following problems:
>
> 1. CPU-bound tasks which use all CPU cores have a severe impact on
> responsiveness. For example, the following bash command (which
> simply starts one busyloop per core) is enough to make the machine
> almost completely unresponsive:
>
> for N in $(seq $(nproc)) ; do while true ; do ; done & ; done
>
> 2. Nearly all tasks in the process listing are shown with 0% CPU
> usage, even when they're CPU-bound. The only exceptions are the
> kernel migration and kthreadd tasks, and occasionally the init
> process.
>
> I have bisected the problem to commit
> 1cf4f629d9d246519a1e76c021806f2a51ddba4d ("cpu/hotplug: Move online
> calls to hotplugged cpu"), which is part of Thomas Gleixner's CPU
> hotplug refactoring patchset [1]. It introduces both problems
> described above.
I doubt that, but that commit has been a bisect victim before ...
> My system is a GIGABYTE X79S-UP5-WIFI motherboard (F5f BIOS) with an
> i7-4960X CPU, running Arch Linux. I've reproduced with both the
> distro's kernel config [2], as well as a minimal config for my
> system. I can reproduce the problems on the latest rc at the moment,
> v4.7-rc5.
>
> Comparing dmesg output before and after 1cf4f629, I see no notable
> differences.
>
> I noticed an existing thread "S3 resume regression" [3] referencing
> this commit, however it describes a different problem. I also found a
> Bugzilla issue for the zero CPU usage problem [4], however it has no
> replies.
That one says:
* After an hour or less (I have no idea), the top/ps start working
* I do have exactly the same problem with the LTS branch 4.4.14
* With 4.5.4 I cannot reproduce the problem just after booting
I tried to reproduce the issue on a couple of machines, but no luck.
No idea at the moment, but Cc'ed scheduler folks.
Thanks,
tglx
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Subject: PROBLEM: CPU accounting/scheduling regression in v4.6 CPU scheduling patchset? Vladimir Panteleev <thecybershadow@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 19:30 +0200 Re: Subject: PROBLEM: CPU accounting/scheduling regression in v4.6 CPU scheduling patchset? Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-07-04 22:50 +0200 Re: Subject: PROBLEM: CPU accounting/scheduling regression in v4.6 CPU scheduling patchset? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-05 10:20 +0200
csiph-web