Re: [RFC PATCH] tracing: add sched_prio_update

From	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [RFC PATCH] tracing: add sched_prio_update
Date	2016-07-06 16:20 +0200
Message-ID	<rRVQd-1PF-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rRica-1me-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rRAiK-4z1-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rRGxP-6u-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rRUUa-1e4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rRVGx-1Ml-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:53:24 -0400
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@efficios.com> wrote:

 
> > I'm not convinced this should be needed. I hate adding back to back
> > tracepoints.  
> 
> Indeed, having two tracepoints back to back is not pretty. We placed it
> here to get the priority of the newly created threads. Maybe a more
> appropriate way of doing that would be to extend the sched_process_fork
> tracepoint to output the same scheduling informations. Would you prefer
> that option ?

That may be a possibility. Let's see what Peter thinks.

-- Steve

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[RFC PATCH] tracing: add sched_prio_update Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@efficios.com> - 2016-07-04 22:00 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH] tracing: add sched_prio_update Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-07-05 17:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH] tracing: add sched_prio_update Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2016-07-06 00:00 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH] tracing: add sched_prio_update Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-07-06 15:20 +0200
        Re: [RFC PATCH] tracing: add sched_prio_update Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@efficios.com> - 2016-07-06 16:10 +0200
          Re: [RFC PATCH] tracing: add sched_prio_update Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-07-06 16:20 +0200

csiph-web