Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1436424

Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: CSeq 0 is a valid CSeq

Show all headers | View raw

Le 04/07/2016 à 07:48, Liping Zhang a écrit :
> 2016-07-01 17:48 GMT+08:00 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>:
>> Do not drop packet when CSeq is 0 as 0 is also a valid value for CSeq.
>>
>> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
>> @@ -1368,6 +1368,7 @@ static int process_sip_response(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
>>         struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
>>         unsigned int matchoff, matchlen, matchend;
>>         unsigned int code, cseq, i;
>> +       char buf[21];
>>
>>         if (*datalen < strlen("SIP/2.0 200"))
>>                 return NF_ACCEPT;
>> @@ -1382,8 +1383,13 @@ static int process_sip_response(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
>>                 nf_ct_helper_log(skb, ct, "cannot parse cseq");
>>                 return NF_DROP;
>>         }
>> -       cseq = simple_strtoul(*dptr + matchoff, NULL, 10);
>> -       if (!cseq) {
>
> I think there is no need to convert simple_strtoul to kstrtouint, add
> a further check seems better?
> Like this:
>  -       if (!cseq) {
> +       if (!cseq && *(*dptr + matchoff) != '0') {
>

And what about an invalid CSeq that would look like CSeq: 0abzk852 ?
Should we check it is 0 + space instead ?

>> +       if (matchlen > sizeof(buf) - 1) {
>> +               nf_ct_helper_log(skb, ct, "cannot parse cseq (too big)");
>> +               return NF_DROP;
>> +       }
>> +       memcpy(buf, *dptr + matchoff, matchlen);
>> +       buf[matchlen] = 0;
>> +       if (kstrtouint(buf, 10, &cseq)) {
>>                 nf_ct_helper_log(skb, ct, "cannot get cseq");
>>                 return NF_DROP;
>>         }

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: CSeq 0 is a valid CSeq Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> - 2016-07-01 11:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: CSeq 0 is a valid CSeq Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 07:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: CSeq 0 is a valid CSeq Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> - 2016-07-04 08:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: CSeq 0 is a valid CSeq Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 13:50 +0200

csiph-web