Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1434057

Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence

From "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence
Date 2016-06-29 23:20 +0200
Message-ID <rPv3P-Q1-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rPj2F-1OB-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rPj2F-1OB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rPnzj-4DH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rPsyZ-7FB-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 6/29/2016 9:16 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>> Well, this is a rather obvious one, so I'm wondering why it is the
>> last one in the series?
>>
>
> The first three are more relevant to each other. It makes easy to
> correlate the changes.

But this one doesn't seem to depend on them and it could be applied
without them, right?

Thanks,
Rafael

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH V2 4/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-06-29 10:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-06-29 15:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-06-29 20:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-06-29 23:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-06-29 23:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-06-29 23:50 +0200

csiph-web