Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1434764
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/9] [v3] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys |
| Date | 2016-06-30 19:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rPOg9-44d-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rHVHP-78L-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rPHHH-8v7-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rPNk7-3v4-75@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> wrote: > On 06/30/2016 02:41 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> wrote: >>> Are there any concerns with merging these into the x86 tree so >>> that they go upstream for 4.8? The updates here are pretty >>> minor. >> >>> include/linux/pkeys.h | 39 +- >>> include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h | 5 + >>> include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 12 +- >>> mm/mprotect.c | 134 +- >> >> So I'd love to have some high level MM review & ack for these syscall ABI >> extensions. > > That's a quite reasonable request, but I'm really surprised by it at > this point. The proposed ABI is one very straightforward extension to > one existing system call, plus four others that you personally suggested. > I apologize for the very late review, but (see other thread) I think we may need to make sure we've defined the signal delivery semantics in a useful way before enabling these. I'm not convinced that the current behavior is helpful. This may or may not require any change to the syscall signatures, but I can imagine that doing it right would involve adding another syscall to *read* the current signal-delivery state of a pkey or perhaps of all the pkeys. That could potentially be achieved by adding an extra pointer parameter to pkey_get so pkey_get can return both the current state and the state at next signal delivery. --Andy
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 0/9] [v3] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-06-30 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/9] [v3] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2016-06-30 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/9] [v3] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-06-30 19:50 +0200
csiph-web