Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1434522
| From | Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: Unloop sched avg decaying |
| Date | 2016-06-30 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rPJJv-1fQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rJYrT-6Cf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJYrT-6Cf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJYUV-6QY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:58:42PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:28:01PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 385c947..0c0578a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -666,17 +666,17 @@ bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
> > void sched_avg_update(struct rq *rq)
> > {
> > s64 period = sched_avg_period();
> > + s64 delta;
> > + u64 rem;
> > + int pending;
> >
> > + delta = (s64)(rq_clock(rq) - rq->age_stamp);
> > + if (delta <= period)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + pending = div64_u64_rem(delta, period, &rem);
> > + rq->age_stamp += delta - rem;
> > + rq->rt_avg >>= pending;
> > }
>
> Blergh, and now do the profile on machine that doesn't have major
> transistor count dedicated to divisions.
Indeed I was afraid of something like that. That said I'm not sure which
is worse between iteration or division out of native asm.
Would it be worth testing?
>
> Why not add the division to the nohz exit path only?
It would be worse I think because we may exit much more often from nohz
than we reach a sched_avg_period().
So the only safe optimization I can do for now is:
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 8b489fc..4632d31 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -626,8 +626,9 @@ bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
void sched_avg_update(struct rq *rq)
{
s64 period = sched_avg_period();
+ int i;
- while ((s64)(rq_clock(rq) - rq->age_stamp) > period) {
+ for (i = 0; (s64)(rq_clock(rq) - rq->age_stamp) > period); i++) {
/*
* Inline assembly required to prevent the compiler
* optimising this loop into a divmod call.
@@ -635,8 +636,8 @@ void sched_avg_update(struct rq *rq)
*/
asm("" : "+rm" (rq->age_stamp));
rq->age_stamp += period;
- rq->rt_avg /= 2;
}
+ rq->rt_avg >>= i;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: Unloop sched avg decaying Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: Unloop sched avg decaying Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-30 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: Unloop sched avg decaying Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 14:00 +0200
csiph-web