Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1434301
| From | Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [merged] mm-compaction-abort-free-scanner-if-split-fails.patch removed from -mm tree |
| Date | 2016-06-30 09:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rPEJQ-6JB-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rPiJk-1HZ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rPiJk-1HZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rPkBs-2SX-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:05:09PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 06/29/2016 10:12 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > >>@@ -1035,8 +1034,12 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct com > >> continue; > >> > >> /* Found a block suitable for isolating free pages from. */ > >>- isolate_freepages_block(cc, &isolate_start_pfn, > >>- block_end_pfn, freelist, false); > >>+ isolated = isolate_freepages_block(cc, &isolate_start_pfn, > >>+ block_end_pfn, freelist, false); > >>+ /* If isolation failed early, do not continue needlessly */ > >>+ if (!isolated && isolate_start_pfn < block_end_pfn && > >>+ cc->nr_migratepages > cc->nr_freepages) > >>+ break; > > > >Hello, David. > > > >Minchan found the bug on this patch. > > Was it reported in some mail to linux-mm before the patch was sent > to Linus, or just now? Unfortunately, we found it yesterday and discussed it in offline. Thanks.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [merged] mm-compaction-abort-free-scanner-if-split-fails.patch removed from -mm tree Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-06-29 10:10 +0200
Re: [merged] mm-compaction-abort-free-scanner-if-split-fails.patch removed from -mm tree Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-06-29 12:10 +0200
Re: [merged] mm-compaction-abort-free-scanner-if-split-fails.patch removed from -mm tree Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-06-30 09:40 +0200
csiph-web