Re: [LKP] [lkp] [dcache_{readdir, dir_lseek}() users] 4e82901cd6: reaim.jobs_per_min -49.1% regression

From	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [LKP] [lkp] [dcache_{readdir, dir_lseek}() users] 4e82901cd6: reaim.jobs_per_min -49.1% regression
Date	2016-06-26 23:30 +0200
Message-ID	<rOpMW-837-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <rFuiK-2lh-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFDP3-8ex-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rOf17-195-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rOlSV-5HA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rOmFk-6eX-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> FWIW, #work.dcache_readdir in vfs.git seems to recover the performance.
> Not sure if it's worth pushing right now, but if it ends up the next
> cycle stuff, I think it'll be worth Cc:stable.

Hmm. I guess that if you're confident enough about it, we might as
well merge it now and avoid the backport and stable headache.

              Linus

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [dcache_{readdir, dir_lseek}() users] 4e82901cd6:  reaim.jobs_per_min -49.1% regression Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> - 2016-06-26 12:00 +0200
  Re: [LKP] [lkp] [dcache_{readdir, dir_lseek}() users] 4e82901cd6:  reaim.jobs_per_min -49.1% regression Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-06-26 19:20 +0200
    Re: [LKP] [lkp] [dcache_{readdir, dir_lseek}() users] 4e82901cd6:  reaim.jobs_per_min -49.1% regression Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-06-26 20:10 +0200
      Re: [LKP] [lkp] [dcache_{readdir, dir_lseek}() users] 4e82901cd6:  reaim.jobs_per_min -49.1% regression Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-06-26 23:30 +0200

csiph-web