Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1432100

Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Xinhui,

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 01:41:29PM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> This is to fix some holder preemption issues. Spinning at one
> vcpu which is preempted is meaningless.
> 
> Kernel need such interfaces, So lets support it.
> 
> We also should suooprt both the shared and dedicated mode.
> So add lppaca_dedicated_proc macro in lppaca.h
> 
> Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/lppaca.h   |  6 ++++++
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/lppaca.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/lppaca.h
> index d0a2a2f..0a263d3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/lppaca.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/lppaca.h
> @@ -111,12 +111,18 @@ extern struct lppaca lppaca[];
>   * we will have to transition to something better.
>   */
>  #define LPPACA_OLD_SHARED_PROC		2
> +#define LPPACA_OLD_DEDICATED_PROC      (1 << 6)
>  

I think you should describe a little bit about the magic number here,
i.e. what document/specification says this should work, and how this
works.

>  static inline bool lppaca_shared_proc(struct lppaca *l)
>  {
>  	return !!(l->__old_status & LPPACA_OLD_SHARED_PROC);
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool lppaca_dedicated_proc(struct lppaca *l)
> +{
> +	return !!(l->__old_status & LPPACA_OLD_DEDICATED_PROC);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * SLB shadow buffer structure as defined in the PAPR.  The save_area
>   * contains adjacent ESID and VSID pairs for each shadowed SLB.  The
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index 523673d..ae938ee 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,21 @@
>  #define SYNC_IO
>  #endif
>  
> +/* For fixing some spinning issues in a guest.
> + * kernel would check if vcpu is preempted during a spin loop.
> + * we support that.
> + */
> +#define arch_vcpu_is_preempted arch_vcpu_is_preempted
> +static inline bool arch_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)

This function should be guarded by #ifdef PPC_PSERIES .. #endif, right?
Because if the kernel is not compiled with guest support,
vcpu_is_preempted() should always be false, right?

> +{
> +	struct lppaca *lp = &lppaca_of(cpu);
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!(lppaca_shared_proc(lp) ||
> +			lppaca_dedicated_proc(lp))))

Do you want to detect whether we are running in a guest(ie. pseries
kernel) here? Then I wonder whether "machine_is(pseries)" works here.

Regards,
Boqun

> +		return false;
> +	return !!(be32_to_cpu(lp->yield_count) & 1);
> +}
> +
>  static __always_inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
>  {
>  	return lock.slock == 0;
> -- 
> 2.4.11
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 0/3] implement vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-27 15:50 +0200
  [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-27 15:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-27 16:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-28 05:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 17:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-28 05:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-06-28 07:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-28 07:40 +0200
  [PATCH 1/3] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-27 15:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check  interface Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-27 16:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check  interface Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-27 16:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-28 05:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check  interface Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-28 09:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-28 11:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check  interface Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 16:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-28 05:20 +0200

csiph-web