Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1429756

Re: [PATCH 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update() after mode update

From "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update() after mode update
Date 2016-06-23 14:30 +0200
Message-ID <rNbVE-1sW-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rMGoO-5UW-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMIAh-7xZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> wrote:
> Because several drivers do the following pattern:
> .set_mode()
>    ...
>    local_data->mode = new_mode;
>    thermal_zone_device_update(tz);
>
> makes sense to simply do the thermal_zone_device_update()
> in thermal core, after setting the new mode.
>
> Also, this patch also remove deadlocks on drivers that
> call thermal_zone_device_update() on .set_mode(),
> as .set_mode()  is now called always with tz->lock held.

To me, this part of the patch is way more important than the
optimization mentioned before.

Apparently, the problem is that drivers deadlock, because the
thermal_zone_device_update() invoked from ->set_mode() is called under
tz->lock.

So to address that problem you make the core call
thermal_zone_device_update() after ->set_mode() outside of tz->lock
and the drivers don't have to do it any more.

Is that correct?

Thanks,
Rafael

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 02/15] thermal: sysfs: lock tz while on access to mode  properties Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> - 2016-06-22 04:50 +0200
  [PATCH 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update() after mode update Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 07:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update()  after mode update "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-06-23 14:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update()  after mode update Keerthy <a0393675@ti.com> - 2016-06-23 14:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update()  after mode update Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 23:00 +0200
  [PATCHv2 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update() after mode update Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 07:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update()  after mode update Keerthy <a0393675@ti.com> - 2016-06-22 11:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update()  after mode update Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 16:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update()  after mode update Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 17:10 +0200
  [PATCHv3 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update() after mode update Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 16:40 +0200
  [PATCHv4 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update() after mode update Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 17:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCHv4 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update()  after mode update Keerthy <a0393675@ti.com> - 2016-06-23 06:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCHv4 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update()  after mode update Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2016-06-23 07:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCHv4 1/1] thermal: core: call  thermal_zone_device_update() after mode update "Peter Feuerer" <peter@piie.net> - 2016-07-03 11:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCHv4 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update()  after mode update Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> - 2016-06-29 08:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCHv4 1/1] thermal: core: call thermal_zone_device_update()  after mode update Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 23:00 +0200

csiph-web