Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1431075
| From | Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with the security tree |
| Date | 2016-06-25 09:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rNQcp-2yr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <rNfwe-45d-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rNsa5-45P-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rNAU1-1d8-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rNBdn-1jE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rNC9s-1Zd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:20:52PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > > I'm a bit concerned about user space pointers passed as argument for compat > > tasks. These need to mask out 33 instead of 32 bits. This is of course > > system call specific and I don't know enough about audit to tell if it > > could be a problem. > > From a practical point of view I'm not sure how much of an impact that > will have as it is unlikely anyone will be doing anything useful with > those pointer values; for example, you aren't going to be inspecting a > process' memory space using just the audit log. Also, at the very > least we aren't removing any information, just adding in an extra bit > of potential junk. Anyone who does care about user space pointers in > the audit log, should have all the information the need to drop the > high bit. > > Does that sound reasonable? Yes, it does. If there should be problems because of the one extra bit that potentially contains garbage we still can look for a way to fix this. Thanks!
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with the security tree Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-24 07:50 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with the security tree Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2016-06-24 17:10 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with the security tree Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-24 17:30 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with the security tree Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2016-06-24 18:30 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with the security tree Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-25 09:30 +0200
csiph-web