Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1430688
| From | Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [ldv-project] [net] rtl8188ee: a potential race condition |
| Date | 2016-06-24 16:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rNA7D-Hi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rIqVj-2LW-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Friday 10 June 2016 01:51 PM, Pavel Andrianov wrote: > Hi! > > There is a potential data race in drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/rtl8188ee.ko. > > In the function rtl88ee_gpio_radio_on_off_checking the flag ppsc->rfchange_inprogress is set with a spinlock protection. In the function rtl_ps_set_rf_state the flag is read also under a spinlock. But the function rtl88e_dm_watchdog read it without any locks. As a result rtl88e_dm_watchdog may execute the succeeding code while changing (with the flag rfchange_inprogress == true). I do not exactly determine the consequences, but likely they are not good if there exists such check. Could anybody more confident confirm this? > > The function rtl_ps_set_rf_state is always called with its parameter [protect_or_not == false]. Is this flag really necessary, if the value 'true' is never used? The function is also set the flag ppsc->rfchange_inprogress and may affect the rtl88e_dm_watchdog as in the previous case. I think the patch was sent sometime ago for removing the parameter. But I am not sure why it's not applied. May be Larry can have better idea about this. Here, is link to the patch: http://linux-wireless.vger.kernel.narkive.com/mu4t9xxr/patch-3-4-rtlwifi-rtl8192cu-remove-unused-parameter -- Vaishali
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [ldv-project] [net] rtl8188ee: a potential race condition Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@oracle.com> - 2016-06-24 16:20 +0200 Re: [ldv-project] [net] rtl8188ee: a potential race condition Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> - 2016-06-24 16:50 +0200
csiph-web