Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1428011

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21
Date 2016-06-21 19:40 +0200
Message-ID <rMxOy-pg-41@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <rMuH0-6Vn-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMuH0-6Vn-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMuH0-6Vn-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMxlv-eK-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMxlv-eK-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 07:06:07PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:26:19AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> > This has been true since gcc 4.x when tilepro support was first added.
> > 
> > In any case if you replace the #include <asm/unistd.h> with
> > 
> > #define __NR_FAST_cmpxchg    -1
> > #define __NR_FAST_atomic_update    -2
> > #define __NR_FAST_cmpxchg64    -3
> > 
> > that should also probably fix it, though I haven't tested it.  It probably
> > wouldn't be crazy to just put those #defines directly in tilepro's atomic.h,
> > since it's not like those fast system call numbers will ever change.

OK, I seem to have a tilepro-linux-gcc-6.1.1 build done. Lets see if I
can build me a kernel with it.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-06-21 07:50 +0200
  Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 09:10 +0200
    Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 10:50 +0200
      Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 11:00 +0200
    Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 14:50 +0200
      Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 16:20 +0200
        Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 16:30 +0200
        Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 16:40 +0200
        Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 19:10 +0200
          Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 19:40 +0200
            Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 20:30 +0200
              Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 21:10 +0200
              Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 22:50 +0200
                Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-06-21 23:30 +0200
                Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-22 23:10 +0200
              Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-22 11:20 +0200
      Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 16:30 +0200

csiph-web