Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1428908
| From | Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 08/27] mm, vmscan: Simplify the logic deciding whether kswapd sleeps |
| Date | 2016-06-22 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rMSpX-5fh-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rMuGZ-6Vn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMuGZ-6Vn-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 06/21/2016 04:15 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > kswapd goes through some complex steps trying to figure out if it > should stay awake based on the classzone_idx and the requested order. > It is unnecessarily complex and passes in an invalid classzone_idx to > balance_pgdat(). What matters most of all is whether a larger order has > been requsted and whether kswapd successfully reclaimed at the previous > order. This patch irons out the logic to check just that and the end result > is less headache inducing. > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> > Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> I'm just not entirely convinced that the direct full sleep bypass is worth the added complexity. I can even imagine it being counter productive in some situations. But it's not a big issue.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 08/27] mm, vmscan: Simplify the logic deciding whether kswapd sleeps Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2016-06-21 16:20 +0200 Re: [PATCH 08/27] mm, vmscan: Simplify the logic deciding whether kswapd sleeps Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-06-22 17:40 +0200
csiph-web