Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1428827

Re: [PATCH] kvm, x86: Properly check whether a pfn is an MMIO or not

From "Raslan, KarimAllah" <karahmed@amazon.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] kvm, x86: Properly check whether a pfn is an MMIO or not
Date 2016-06-22 16:20 +0200
Message-ID <rMRax-4xg-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rMGf7-5Rv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMQHw-47X-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On 6/22/16, 3:41 PM, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
>On 22/06/2016 04:34, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
>> pfn_valid check is not sufficient because it only checks if a page has a struct
>> page or not, if for example "mem=" was passed to the kernel some valid pages
>> won't have a struct page. This means that if guests were assigned valid memory
>> that lies after the mem= boundary it will be passed uncached to the guest no
>> matter what the guest caching attributes are for this memory.
>
>How can you pass memory after the mem= boundary to the guest?

Memory regions can be assigned to the guest as long as you've a valid host
virtual address. You can always get a host virtual address for any RAM that
lives after 'mem=' for example by simply mmaping /dev/mem or even using some
special kernel module to mmap these regions from user space.

>
>Paolo
>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] kvm, x86: Properly check whether a pfn is an MMIO or not KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de> - 2016-06-22 04:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] kvm, x86: Properly check whether a pfn is an MMIO or not Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-22 15:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] kvm, x86: Properly check whether a pfn is an MMIO or not "Raslan, KarimAllah" <karahmed@amazon.de> - 2016-06-22 16:20 +0200

csiph-web