Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1428540
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: initialize throttle_count for new task-groups lazily |
| Date | 2016-06-22 10:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rMLHQ-ZT-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rKF3Q-8v4-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMBIu-2Rm-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMLy9-Wz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:10:46AM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > On 22.06.2016 00:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:57:01PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > >>Cgroup created inside throttled group must inherit current throttle_count. > >>Broken throttle_count allows to nominate throttled entries as a next buddy, > >>later this leads to null pointer dereference in pick_next_task_fair(). > >> > >>This patch initialize cfs_rq->throttle_count at first enqueue: laziness > >>allows to skip locking all rq at group creation. Lazy approach also allows > >>to skip full sub-tree scan at throttling hierarchy (not in this patch). > > > >You're talking about taking rq->lock in alloc_fair_sched_group(), right? > > > >We're about to go do that anyway... But I suppose for backports this > >makes sense. Doing it at creation time also avoids the issues Ben > >raised, right? > > Yes, all will be fine. But for 8192-cores this will be disaster =) Well, creating cgroups isn't something you do much of, and creating them will be proportionally expensive already, as we allocate all kinds of per-cpu data. In any case, we 'need' to do this because of the per entity load tracking stuff, entities, even blocked, should be added to the cfs_rq. > throttle_count must be initialized after linking tg into lists. obviously. Crud, that's later than we currently take the rq lock. Let me see how much pain it is to re-order all that.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] sched/fair: initialize throttle_count for new task-groups lazily Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2016-06-16 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: initialize throttle_count for new task-groups lazily bsegall@google.com - 2016-06-16 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: initialize throttle_count for new task-groups lazily Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2016-06-16 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: initialize throttle_count for new task-groups lazily bsegall@google.com - 2016-06-16 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: initialize throttle_count for new task-groups lazily Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2016-06-21 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: initialize throttle_count for new task-groups lazily Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: initialize throttle_count for new task-groups lazily Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2016-06-22 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: initialize throttle_count for new task-groups lazily Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-22 10:30 +0200
csiph-web