Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1426309

Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier

From Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier
Date 2016-06-20 10:10 +0200
Message-ID <rM2ro-5J9-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <rKQ8V-7Ix-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rL4bU-8nW-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <rL4bU-8nW-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <rLk6Z-1K7-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rLk6Z-1K7-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 04:46:20PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:17:27PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > keep the xchg() function as it is or use smp_store_release(&next->locked,
> > 1). So which one is a better alternative for ARM or PPC?
> > 
> 
> For PPC, I think xchg_release() + smp_store_release() is better than the 
> current code, because the former has two lwsync while the latter has two
> sync, and sync is quite expensive than lwsync on PPC.
> 
> I need to leave the ARM part to Will ;-)

I doubt there's much in it, but xchg() has DMB + release, so xchg_release +
smp_store_release is probably slightly better for us too.

Will

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com> - 2016-06-15 00:50 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 10:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-15 19:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 04:20 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-06-16 12:20 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 02:50 +0200
        Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-06-17 17:50 +0200
          Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 10:50 +0200
            Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-06-20 10:10 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-06-15 19:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-15 19:20 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-06-15 20:30 +0200
        Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-15 20:50 +0200
          Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-06-15 21:00 +0200
          Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-06-17 03:20 +0200
            Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-06-17 18:30 +0200
              Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-06-17 18:50 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v2 1/6] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper  acquire/release barrier Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-16 00:00 +0200

csiph-web