Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1424968
| From | Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] spi: add spi_sync_single_transfer wrapper for single spi_transfer |
| Date | 2016-06-17 13:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rL0rE-60E-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rKsJj-HV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKQ8W-7Ix-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKIbn-28U-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKQ8V-7Ix-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rL0hX-5Wp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:34:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 09:43:11AM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote: > > > > > The spi_sync_single_transfer function calls spi_sync_transfer > > > > with a single spi_transfer element, instead of an array. > > > > So, what's the advantage of using this as opposed to calling > > > spi_sync_transfer with a 1 for the number of transfers? > > > Not much, but it keeps the code a bit nicer to read for those > > using spi_sync_transfer with only one spi_transfer. Besides it's > > also more understandable what the function itself does and there > > would not be any need to jump into the spi_sync_transfer to check > > what the number '1' is needed for (for example it's not a boolean > > 'true' value). > > I really don't think this has been a big source of confusion for people. OK, nevermind, then :) Thanks, Andi
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] spi: add spi_sync_single_transfer wrapper for single spi_transfer Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> - 2016-06-16 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] spi: add spi_sync_single_transfer wrapper for single spi_transfer Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2016-06-16 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] spi: add spi_sync_single_transfer wrapper for single spi_transfer Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> - 2016-06-17 02:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] spi: add spi_sync_single_transfer wrapper for single spi_transfer Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-06-17 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] spi: add spi_sync_single_transfer wrapper for single spi_transfer Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org> - 2016-06-17 13:50 +0200
csiph-web