Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1423573
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce the latent_entropy gcc plugin |
| Date | 2016-06-16 01:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rKsgi-wr-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rK4QF-2oZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKocF-6cT-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKpLt-7fO-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKs6C-tc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 16:01 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:55:44 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > > > The limit on the length of lines is 80 columns and this is a strongly > > > preferred limit. > > I think the code looks worse when it is truncated to 80 columns but > > I'll do it and resend the patches. > Yup, I understand your concerns, but since we're optimizing for > readability by a larger audience that has agreed to the guidelines in > CodingStyle, this is what we get. :) > > One area I'm unclear on with kernel coding style, though, is if > splitting all the stuff prior to function name onto a separate line is > "acceptable", since that solves most of the long lines where > __latent_entropy has been added. For example, I don't know which is > better: > > All on one line (gmail may split this, but my intention is all one line): > > static __latent_entropy void rcu_process_callbacks(struct > softirq_action *unused) > > Types and attributes on a separate line: > > static __latent_entropy void > rcu_process_callbacks(struct softirq_action *unused) > > All arguments on the next line: > > static __latent_entropy void rcu_process_callbacks( > struct > softirq_action *unused) > > > Greg, do you have a better sense of how to split (or not split) these > kinds of long lines? Another option is to add __latent_entropy the same way most __printf uses are done - on a separate line before the function __latent_entropy static void foo(...)
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce the latent_entropy gcc plugin Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 00:20 +0200
[PATCH v3 2/4] Add the latent_entropy gcc plugin Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] Add the latent_entropy gcc plugin Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-06-15 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] Add the latent_entropy gcc plugin Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] Add the latent_entropy gcc plugin Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-06-16 00:40 +0200
[PATCH v3 3/4] Mark functions with the latent_entropy attribute Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 00:20 +0200
[PATCH v3 1/4] Add support for passing gcc plugin arguments Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce the latent_entropy gcc plugin Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-06-15 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce the latent_entropy gcc plugin Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce the latent_entropy gcc plugin Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-06-16 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce the latent_entropy gcc plugin Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-06-16 01:20 +0200
csiph-web