Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1423491
| From | Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Why are the MB/s of avx and raid6: twice as high for a docked ThinkPad than for an undocked ? |
| Date | 2016-06-15 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rKqRc-7Wk-41@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
This diff is reliable depending whether the T440s is docked (right) or not (left) : Linux t44 4.5.7-hardened-r2 #1 SMP Wed Jun 15 23:39:10 CEST 2016 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4300U CPU @ 1.90GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux 215c215 < avx : 10196.000 MB/sec --- > avx : 23504.000 MB/sec 225,234c225,234 < raid6: sse2x1 gen() 2578 MB/s < raid6: sse2x1 xor() 2007 MB/s < raid6: sse2x2 gen() 3246 MB/s < raid6: sse2x2 xor() 2203 MB/s < raid6: sse2x4 gen() 3773 MB/s < raid6: sse2x4 xor() 2640 MB/s < raid6: avx2x1 gen() 5042 MB/s < raid6: avx2x2 gen() 5812 MB/s < raid6: avx2x4 gen() 6824 MB/s < raid6: using algorithm avx2x4 gen() 6824 MB/s --- > raid6: sse2x1 gen() 5816 MB/s > raid6: sse2x1 xor() 4515 MB/s > raid6: sse2x2 gen() 7261 MB/s > raid6: sse2x2 xor() 4968 MB/s > raid6: sse2x4 gen() 8511 MB/s > raid6: sse2x4 xor() 5916 MB/s > raid6: avx2x1 gen() 11378 MB/s > raid6: avx2x2 gen() 13117 MB/s > raid6: avx2x4 gen() 15398 MB/s > raid6: using algorithm avx2x4 gen() 15398 MB/s And why do the units differ (MB/sec versus MB/s) ? -- Toralf PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E, OTR: 420E74C8 30246EE7
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why are the MB/s of avx and raid6: twice as high for a docked ThinkPad than for an undocked ? Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> - 2016-06-15 23:50 +0200
Re: Why are the MB/s of avx and raid6: twice as high for a docked ThinkPad than for an undocked ? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> - 2016-06-16 11:20 +0200
Re: Why are the MB/s of avx and raid6: twice as high for a docked ThinkPad than for an undocked ? Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> - 2016-06-16 12:20 +0200
csiph-web