Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1423092
| From | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 10/10] mm, oom: hide mm which is shared with kthread or global init |
| Date | 2016-06-15 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rKk94-3Hl-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rI6MV-5RF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rI6MW-5RF-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Michal,
I am going to ack the whole series, but send some nits/questions,
On 06/09, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> @@ -283,10 +283,22 @@ enum oom_scan_t oom_scan_process_thread(struct oom_control *oc,
>
> /*
> * This task already has access to memory reserves and is being killed.
> - * Don't allow any other task to have access to the reserves.
> + * Don't allow any other task to have access to the reserves unless
> + * the task has MMF_OOM_REAPED because chances that it would release
> + * any memory is quite low.
> */
> - if (!is_sysrq_oom(oc) && atomic_read(&task->signal->oom_victims))
> - return OOM_SCAN_ABORT;
> + if (!is_sysrq_oom(oc) && atomic_read(&task->signal->oom_victims)) {
> + struct task_struct *p = find_lock_task_mm(task);
> + enum oom_scan_t ret = OOM_SCAN_ABORT;
> +
> + if (p) {
> + if (test_bit(MMF_OOM_REAPED, &p->mm->flags))
> + ret = OOM_SCAN_CONTINUE;
> + task_unlock(p);
OK, but perhaps it would be beter to change oom_badness() to return zero if
MMF_OOM_REAPED is set?
Oleg.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 10/10] mm, oom: hide mm which is shared with kthread or global init Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-06-15 16:40 +0200 Re: [PATCH 10/10] mm, oom: hide mm which is shared with kthread or global init Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-06-16 08:40 +0200
csiph-web