Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1422639

Re: [PATCH] mfd: max77620: Fix FPS switch statements

From Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] mfd: max77620: Fix FPS switch statements
Date 2016-06-15 08:20 +0200
Message-ID <rKclc-7in-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ry2Uh-24P-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHkff-6M-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJZR0-7rp-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com> wrote:
> On 6/7/2016 4:05 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 May 2016, Rhyland Klein wrote:
>>
>>> When configuring FPS during probe, assuming a DT node is present for
>>> FPS, the code can run into a problem with the switch statements in
>>> max77620_config_fps() and max77620_get_fps_period_reg_value(). Namely,
>>> in the case of chip->chip_id == MAX77620, it will set
>>> fps_[mix|max]_period but then fall through to the default switch case
>>> and return -EINVAL. Returning this from max77620_config_fps() will
>>> cause probe to fail.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mfd/max77620.c | 2 ++
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> Applied to -fixes with Thierry and Laxman's Acks.
>>
>
> I don't see this in linux-next yet (as of 20160614). Can we get this
> merged there to.

Was about to say the same thing. FWIW:

Tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] mfd: max77620: Fix FPS switch statements Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-14 19:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] mfd: max77620: Fix FPS switch statements Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 08:20 +0200

csiph-web