Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1424087
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2] PM / OPP: 'UNKNOWN' status of opp-table->shared |
| Date | 2016-06-16 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rKFZU-Cr-47@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rKFGy-vH-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() returns 0 even in the case where the OPP
> core doesn't know if the table is shared or not. It is working for most
> of the platforms, as the OPP table was never created and we returned
> -ENODEV then.
>
> But in case of one of the platforms (Jetson TK1) at least, the situation
> is a bit different. The OPP table is created (somehow) before
> dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() is called and so we returned 0. The caller
> of this routine treated that as 'CPUs don't share OPPs' and that had bad
> consequences on performance.
>
> Fix this by creating a converting 'shared_opp' to an enum.
> dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() returns -EINVAL now in case the status in
> access-unknown, so that the caller can handle it accordingly (cpufreq-dt
> considers that as 'all CPUs share the table').
>
> Fixes: 6f707daa3833 ("PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus()")
> Reported-and-tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
I've queued it up, but I rewrote the changelog.
Please check in bleeding-edge.
Thanks!
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V2] PM / OPP: 'UNKNOWN' status of opp-table->shared Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-16 15:40 +0200 Re: [PATCH V2] PM / OPP: 'UNKNOWN' status of opp-table->shared "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-06-16 16:00 +0200
csiph-web