Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1420476
| From | Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: introduce the mtd_pairing_scheme concept |
| Date | 2016-06-13 08:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJtxM-2sZ-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rrLCO-3W5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rrLCO-3W5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rIGGK-5yx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rIL3H-85W-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJt4J-23X-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 10:55:32PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 08:54:08AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 19:17:15 -0700 > > Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote: [...] > > > Also, the "pair" term (and examples you use) seem to imply 2-cell MLC, > > > whereas I believe you're trying to handle TLC too. I don't know if we > > > should drop the "pair" term, or just explain it better. > > > > I clearly have some problems with the words I've chosen, but those terms > > were extracted from NAND datasheets (group and pair), and I think > > keeping the same wording help people converting datasheet specs into > > pairing scheme implementation. > > > > Any suggestions to replace those 2 words? > > I'm not sure we should replace the words (esp. if those are used by > multiple vendors). [...] I see that George highlighted a Micron datasheet in other parts of this thread, and I noticed it uses the term "shared page." That explains why I couldn't find the word "pair" in my quick search of Micron datasheets! So I guess "shared page" would be a nomination, though I'm certainly not forcing it, if you think pair is better. Brian
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: introduce the mtd_pairing_scheme concept Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: introduce the mtd_pairing_scheme concept Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-06-11 09:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: introduce the mtd_pairing_scheme concept Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 08:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: introduce the mtd_pairing_scheme concept Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: introduce the mtd_pairing_scheme concept Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-06-13 08:40 +0200
csiph-web