Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1422020

Re: [PATCH V4] irq: Track the interrupt timings

From Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH V4] irq: Track the interrupt timings
Date 2016-06-14 17:40 +0200
Message-ID <rJYBz-6HN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rnqQi-jn-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rIw4F-5RL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJWJr-5qn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJYid-6wL-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 06/14/2016 05:10 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
>> On 06/10/2016 04:52 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>>>> +	timings->sum -= timings->values[timings->w_index];
>>>> +	timings->values[timings->w_index] = diff;
>>>> +	timings->sum += diff;
>>>
>>> Now the real question is whether you really need all that math, checks and
>>> memsets in the irq hotpath. If you make the storage slightly larger then you
>>> can just store the values unconditionally in the circular buffer and do all
>>> the computational stuff when you really it.
>>
>> Yes, that was one concern when I wrote the code: do some basic computation
>> when an interrupt occurs, and the rest after or do the entire math when
>> entering idle.
>>
>> If the storage is a bit larger (let's say 16 values) and there is no memset
>> and the sum is not computed, at least we need a count for the number of values
>> in the array before this one is fulfilled, otherwise the statistics will be
>> wrong as we will take into account the entire array with old values, no ?
>
> The point is not to change from 8 to 16 entries, but to store raw 64-bit
> timestamps instead of computed 32-bit deltas.  Whether or not those
> timestamps are too far apart and discarded can be done at idle entry
> time.

Ah, ok. That makes sense.

Thanks for the clarification.

  -- Daniel

-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH V4] irq: Track the interrupt timings Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-06-14 15:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V4] irq: Track the interrupt timings Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2016-06-14 17:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V4] irq: Track the interrupt timings Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-06-14 17:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V4] irq: Track the interrupt timings Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-06-14 18:40 +0200

csiph-web