Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1421987

Re: [PATCH 06/27] mm, vmscan: Make kswapd reclaim in terms of nodes

From Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 06/27] mm, vmscan: Make kswapd reclaim in terms of nodes
Date 2016-06-14 17:00 +0200
Message-ID <rJXYS-69X-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rJa25-6U7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJa25-6U7-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 05:33:24PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > -	/*
> > -	 * We put equal pressure on every zone, unless one zone has way too
> > -	 * many pages free already. The "too many pages" is defined as the
> > -	 * high wmark plus a "gap" where the gap is either the low
> > -	 * watermark or 1% of the zone, whichever is smaller.
> > -	 */
> > -	balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone), DIV_ROUND_UP(
> > -			zone->managed_pages, KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO));
> > +		nr_to_reclaim += max(high_wmark_pages(zone), SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX);
> > +	}
> 
> Missing sc->nr_to_reclaim = nr_to_reclaim; ?
> 

Yes. It may explain why I saw lower than expected kswapd in more
detailed tests recently. Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 06/27] mm, vmscan: Make kswapd reclaim in terms of nodes "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2016-06-12 11:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 06/27] mm, vmscan: Make kswapd reclaim in terms of nodes Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2016-06-14 17:00 +0200

csiph-web