Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1421663

[PATCH v2] sched: unlikely corrupted stack end

From WANG Chao <wcwxyz@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH v2] sched: unlikely corrupted stack end
Date 2016-06-14 10:30 +0200
Message-ID <rJRTs-2gr-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rJQkG-16U-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


unlikely() was dropped in commit ce03e4137bb2 ("sched/core: Drop
unlikely behind BUG_ON()"), but commit 29d6455178a0 ("sched: panic on
corrupted stack end") dropped BUG_ON() and called panic directly.

Now we should bring unlikely() back for branch prediction. While we're
at it, it's better and cleaner to turn task_stack_end_corrupted() into
inline function.

Signed-off-by: WANG Chao <wcwxyz@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 6e42ada26345..797ca1975431 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2997,8 +2997,11 @@ static inline unsigned long *end_of_stack(struct task_struct *p)
 }
 
 #endif
-#define task_stack_end_corrupted(task) \
-		(*(end_of_stack(task)) != STACK_END_MAGIC)
+
+static inline int task_stack_end_corrupted(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return unlikely(*(end_of_stack(p)) != STACK_END_MAGIC);
+}
 
 static inline int object_is_on_stack(void *obj)
 {
-- 
2.8.4

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] sched: unlikely corrupted stack end WANG Chao <wcwxyz@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 08:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] sched: unlikely corrupted stack end Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-06-14 09:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] sched: unlikely corrupted stack end Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-14 10:20 +0200
  [PATCH v2] sched: unlikely corrupted stack end WANG Chao <wcwxyz@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 10:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] sched: unlikely corrupted stack end Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-06-14 11:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2] sched: unlikely corrupted stack end WANG Chao <wcwxyz@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 12:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2] sched: unlikely corrupted stack end Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-06-14 12:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v2] sched: unlikely corrupted stack end WANG Chao <wcwxyz@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 19:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v2] sched: unlikely corrupted stack end Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-06-15 10:30 +0200
              [PATCH v3] sched: unlikely corrupted stack end WANG Chao <wcwxyz@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 11:00 +0200

csiph-web