Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1420869
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 1/3] nilfs2: fix misuse of a semaphore in sysfs code |
| Date | Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:00:06 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJAzk-72E-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rJAzk-72E-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :lines; bh=EahfJVBLTeva5u8wzKkEPToxFFbmDR558ckgotklh9A=; b=AXNEs/ezcU0E+FfJeQnAvB+Dj7zJDgJN79tj5qnYeU5Kw/KGxIKOcZhFz7ko5LXtBi FnLy4ygG8JnECq+N6G9O9FHUSRxbI3T+9K+cfKrBB32lcTvtZbxH2og7JmwejjQUvs8a 3BoGi90Xmph28EIFHibfLANVADdH4BZ3zSjGG1hglJdSwJIN7cHf8UnolGmajx4wjfAn CVIPDr8/RaImLzEdiSIx1e0tXkzOpJZ15JjQoAaSqciuE1d/U/rQJ9O+3F9fk76F3Eyy 7TezAr5muedssPUmt+c8Vxs4dWOMUkbNq2Qz9riklvju1pwDrYlHg5P/Nah+SlPrrTYv ql2Q== |
| X-Google-Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :in-reply-to:references:lines; bh=EahfJVBLTeva5u8wzKkEPToxFFbmDR558ckgotklh9A=; b=GRu3Um0mFRV4tpp7AXMLumvtYkXBNL82OESdRhT9GBH9i84LaKvE/d19r4LMIW893Q RqZrB322FK9KYlVUendXnNLahA7QdGp38lPQKqhsn+ICbN8EaArE4fFUawTcvcPeOVMM NlocaN/GRJmSBfrTfVMzBUfd8T78NQwG0bv7Ei+lgijIQ+cgNbCBEBonxc6NUFV6yHXE KHCYqblG1Zp40uzjmwF/6KJDlm1W+3/4jNMp9KGqzVry6jDFL80YE5P/5sIKkOsVLSQi QGJ+75RjaUONHUdMMK1lXwfmxi+/rKeq+W32sJ9Kr3wpkj/JElnr/6OPYpdTUgDJVcKE 7hag== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | ALyK8tI8ve4/wZymTYZ9xHN01Rusd3ujQUDh3AxMcAL16u34mCUZlYmCOJZ4ye7p+Lc7nQ== |
| X-Received | by 10.98.11.4 with SMTP id t4mr21537739pfi.159.1465825861831; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 06:51:01 -0700 (PDT) |
| X-Mailer | git-send-email 1.8.3.1 |
| X-Dispatcher | imput version 20110525(IM151) |
| Lines | 168 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | linux-nilfs <linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> |
| X-Original-Date | Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:45:05 +0900 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <1465825507-3407-2-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> |
| X-Original-References | <1465825507-3407-1-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1420869 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Variables ns_seg_seq, ns_segnum, ns_nextnum, ns_pseg_offset, ns_cno,
ns_ctime, ns_nongc_ctime, and ns_ndirtyblks, are protected by
ns_segctor_sem, but ns_sem is wrongly used by the nilfs sysfs code
when reading these variables. This fixes the misuse and clarifies
which semaphore protects them in the comment of the_nilfs struct.
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
---
fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h | 7 ++-----
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c b/fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c
index 8e57bb9..490303e 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/sysfs.c
@@ -326,9 +326,9 @@ nilfs_checkpoints_next_checkpoint_show(struct nilfs_checkpoints_attr *attr,
{
__u64 cno;
- down_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ down_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
cno = nilfs->ns_cno;
- up_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ up_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n", cno);
}
@@ -511,9 +511,9 @@ nilfs_segctor_current_seg_sequence_show(struct nilfs_segctor_attr *attr,
{
u64 seg_seq;
- down_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ down_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
seg_seq = nilfs->ns_seg_seq;
- up_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ up_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n", seg_seq);
}
@@ -525,9 +525,9 @@ nilfs_segctor_current_last_full_seg_show(struct nilfs_segctor_attr *attr,
{
__u64 segnum;
- down_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ down_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
segnum = nilfs->ns_segnum;
- up_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ up_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n", segnum);
}
@@ -539,9 +539,9 @@ nilfs_segctor_next_full_seg_show(struct nilfs_segctor_attr *attr,
{
__u64 nextnum;
- down_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ down_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
nextnum = nilfs->ns_nextnum;
- up_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ up_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n", nextnum);
}
@@ -553,9 +553,9 @@ nilfs_segctor_next_pseg_offset_show(struct nilfs_segctor_attr *attr,
{
unsigned long pseg_offset;
- down_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ down_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
pseg_offset = nilfs->ns_pseg_offset;
- up_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ up_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%lu\n", pseg_offset);
}
@@ -567,9 +567,9 @@ nilfs_segctor_next_checkpoint_show(struct nilfs_segctor_attr *attr,
{
__u64 cno;
- down_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ down_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
cno = nilfs->ns_cno;
- up_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ up_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n", cno);
}
@@ -581,9 +581,9 @@ nilfs_segctor_last_seg_write_time_show(struct nilfs_segctor_attr *attr,
{
time_t ctime;
- down_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ down_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
ctime = nilfs->ns_ctime;
- up_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ up_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
return NILFS_SHOW_TIME(ctime, buf);
}
@@ -595,9 +595,9 @@ nilfs_segctor_last_seg_write_time_secs_show(struct nilfs_segctor_attr *attr,
{
time_t ctime;
- down_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ down_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
ctime = nilfs->ns_ctime;
- up_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ up_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n", (unsigned long long)ctime);
}
@@ -609,9 +609,9 @@ nilfs_segctor_last_nongc_write_time_show(struct nilfs_segctor_attr *attr,
{
time_t nongc_ctime;
- down_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ down_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
nongc_ctime = nilfs->ns_nongc_ctime;
- up_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ up_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
return NILFS_SHOW_TIME(nongc_ctime, buf);
}
@@ -623,9 +623,9 @@ nilfs_segctor_last_nongc_write_time_secs_show(struct nilfs_segctor_attr *attr,
{
time_t nongc_ctime;
- down_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ down_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
nongc_ctime = nilfs->ns_nongc_ctime;
- up_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ up_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n",
(unsigned long long)nongc_ctime);
@@ -638,9 +638,9 @@ nilfs_segctor_dirty_data_blocks_count_show(struct nilfs_segctor_attr *attr,
{
u32 ndirtyblks;
- down_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ down_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
ndirtyblks = atomic_read(&nilfs->ns_ndirtyblks);
- up_read(&nilfs->ns_sem);
+ up_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%u\n", ndirtyblks);
}
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h
index 79d1421..b305c6f 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h
@@ -122,11 +122,8 @@ struct the_nilfs {
unsigned int ns_sb_update_freq;
/*
- * Following fields are dedicated to a writable FS-instance.
- * Except for the period seeking checkpoint, code outside the segment
- * constructor must lock a segment semaphore while accessing these
- * fields.
- * The writable FS-instance is sole during a lifetime of the_nilfs.
+ * The following fields are updated by a writable FS-instance.
+ * These fields are protected by ns_segctor_sem outside load_nilfs().
*/
u64 ns_seg_seq;
__u64 ns_segnum;
--
1.8.3.1
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/3] nilfs2: fix misuse of a semaphore in sysfs code Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> - 2016-06-13 16:00 +0200
csiph-web