Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1420884
| From | Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] register-field manipulation macros |
| Date | 2016-06-13 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJAIV-7lo-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rJAfT-6Tq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> writes: > Hi! > > This set moves to a global header file macros which I find > very useful and worth popularising. The basic problem is > that since C bitfields are not very dependable accessing > subfields of registers becomes slightly inconvenient. > It is nice to have the necessary mask and shift operations > wrapped in a macro. It is also nice to have that macro > compute the shift amount based on the mask automatically. > > My implementation follows what Felix Fietkau has done in > mt76. Hannes Frederic Sowa suggested more use of standard > Linux/GCC functions. Since the RFC I've also added a > compile-time check to validate that the value passed to > setters fits in the mask. > > I attempted the use of static inlines instead of macros > but it makes GCC < 6.0 barf at the BUILD_BUG_ON()s. > I also noticed that forcing arguments to be u32 for inlines > makes the compiler use 32bit arithmetic where it could > get away with 64bit before (on 64bit machines, obviously). > That's a potential performance concern but probably not > a very practical one today. Apart from looking "cleaner" > static inlines would have the advantage that we could #undef > the auxiliary macros at the end of the header. > > Please review and advise on improvements. > > If accepted I think would be best to push this through > Kalle's tree, since the only existing user is in > drivers/net/wireless/. > > Jakub Kicinski (2): > add basic register-field manipulation macros > mt7601u: use linux/bitfield.h I guess you forgot to CC linux-wireless, adding it now, and hence I don't see these in my patchwork either. So better to resend. -- Kalle Valo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/2] register-field manipulation macros Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> - 2016-06-13 15:40 +0200 [PATCH 2/2] mt7601u: use linux/bitfield.h Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> - 2016-06-13 15:40 +0200 Re: [PATCH 0/2] register-field manipulation macros Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2016-06-13 16:10 +0200
csiph-web