Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1420884

Re: [PATCH 0/2] register-field manipulation macros

From Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 0/2] register-field manipulation macros
Date 2016-06-13 16:10 +0200
Message-ID <rJAIV-7lo-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rJAfT-6Tq-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> writes:

> Hi!
>
> This set moves to a global header file macros which I find
> very useful and worth popularising.  The basic problem is
> that since C bitfields are not very dependable accessing
> subfields of registers becomes slightly inconvenient.
> It is nice to have the necessary mask and shift operations
> wrapped in a macro.  It is also nice to have that macro
> compute the shift amount based on the mask automatically.
>
> My implementation follows what Felix Fietkau has done in
> mt76.  Hannes Frederic Sowa suggested more use of standard
> Linux/GCC functions.  Since the RFC I've also added a 
> compile-time check to validate that the value passed to
> setters fits in the mask.
>
> I attempted the use of static inlines instead of macros
> but it makes GCC < 6.0 barf at the BUILD_BUG_ON()s.
> I also noticed that forcing arguments to be u32 for inlines
> makes the compiler use 32bit arithmetic where it could
> get away with 64bit before (on 64bit machines, obviously).
> That's a potential performance concern but probably not
> a very practical one today.  Apart from looking "cleaner"
> static inlines would have the advantage that we could #undef
> the auxiliary macros at the end of the header.
>
> Please review and advise on improvements.
>
> If accepted I think would be best to push this through
> Kalle's tree, since the only existing user is in
> drivers/net/wireless/.
>
> Jakub Kicinski (2):
>   add basic register-field manipulation macros
>   mt7601u: use linux/bitfield.h

I guess you forgot to CC linux-wireless, adding it now, and hence I
don't see these in my patchwork either. So better to resend.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/2] register-field manipulation macros Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> - 2016-06-13 15:40 +0200
  [PATCH 2/2] mt7601u: use linux/bitfield.h Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> - 2016-06-13 15:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/2] register-field manipulation macros Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2016-06-13 16:10 +0200

csiph-web