Groups > linux.kernel > #1419472

Re: [RFC 0/4] Intel Integrated Sensor Hub Support (ISH)

From	Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [RFC 0/4] Intel Integrated Sensor Hub Support (ISH)
Date	2016-06-10 16:30 +0200
Message-ID	<rIvBD-5Ff-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rEJtv-61m-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rIfZV-3GB-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <rIg9B-3KD-61@gated-at.bofh.it> <rIreG-2SG-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rIv8C-5fJ-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 06:55 -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 10:44 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> [...]
> > 
> > Yes, I do see the in_*_raw_* files in sysfs, and I'm able to get
> > data
> > out of them. Gnome also seems to recognize that the accelerometers
> > are
> > there because it adds a rotation lock button to the system menu.
> > 
> > However, the events are getting through yet. It may be that I'm
> > missing something in my kernel config. I'm rebuilding the kernel
> > with
> > Debian's config for the 4.5.5 kernel as a quick sanity test. I'll
> > report back when I've tried.
> > 
> You need to add in /usr/lib/system/systemd/iio-sensor-*
> 
> After=multi-user.target
> 
> 
> This service starts too early.

Nobody has been able to explain to me why that would be a problem.

Can you back this up with some data? Does iio-sensor-proxy exit too
early? Does that leave time to the IIO sub-system to do some init work
it should already have done?

See also https://github.com/hadess/iio-sensor-proxy/issues/82

> > I'll also take some time and review the patch series later this
> > afternoon.
> 
> Atri Bhattacharya reported issues with suspend/resume. With my test
> patches it is fixed for him
> 
> If you want to hold on, I will repost with fixes for susend/resume.

Thread

Re: [RFC 0/4] Intel Integrated Sensor Hub Support (ISH) Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> - 2016-06-09 23:50 +0200
  Re: [RFC 0/4] Intel Integrated Sensor Hub Support (ISH) Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-06-10 00:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC 0/4] Intel Integrated Sensor Hub Support (ISH) Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> - 2016-06-10 11:50 +0200
      Re: [RFC 0/4] Intel Integrated Sensor Hub Support (ISH) Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-06-10 16:00 +0200
        Re: [RFC 0/4] Intel Integrated Sensor Hub Support (ISH) Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> - 2016-06-10 16:30 +0200
          Re: [RFC 0/4] Intel Integrated Sensor Hub Support (ISH) Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-06-10 16:50 +0200
            Re: [RFC 0/4] Intel Integrated Sensor Hub Support (ISH) Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> - 2016-06-10 17:10 +0200
              Re: [RFC 0/4] Intel Integrated Sensor Hub Support (ISH) Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> - 2016-06-10 17:30 +0200
              Re: [RFC 0/4] Intel Integrated Sensor Hub Support (ISH) Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-06-10 17:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC 0/4] Intel Integrated Sensor Hub Support (ISH) Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> - 2016-06-10 16:10 +0200

csiph-web