Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1418960
| From | Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 17/21] audit: Use timespec64 to represent audit timestamps |
| Date | 2016-06-10 02:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rIiuJ-5BG-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rI0o9-1PH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rI9hM-7C2-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rIi1I-5bB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Red Hat |
On Thursday, June 09, 2016 07:59:43 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 16/06/09, Steve Grubb wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 08, 2016 10:05:01 PM Deepa Dinamani wrote: > > > struct timespec is not y2038 safe. > > > Audit timestamps are recorded in string format into > > > an audit buffer for a given context. > > > These mark the entry timestamps for the syscalls. > > > Use y2038 safe struct timespec64 to represent the times. > > > The log strings can handle this transition as strings can > > > hold upto 1024 characters. > > > > Have you tested this with ausearch or any audit utilities? As an aside, a > > time stamp that is up to 1024 characters long is terribly wasteful > > considering how many events we get. > > Steve, > > I don't expect the size of the time stamp text to change since the > format isn't being changed and I don't expect the date stamp text length > to change until Y10K, but you never know what will happen in 8 > millenia... (Who knows, maybe that damn Linux server in my basement > will still be running then...) > > Isn't the maximum message length MAX_AUDIT_MESSAGE_LENGTH (8970 octets)? Bytes, yes. But I was thinking that if its going to get big we should consider switching from a base 10 representation to base 16. That would give us back a few bytes. We discuss this on the linux-audit list rather than the main list. -Steve
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 17/21] audit: Use timespec64 to represent audit timestamps Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 07:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 17/21] audit: Use timespec64 to represent audit timestamps Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> - 2016-06-09 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 17/21] audit: Use timespec64 to represent audit timestamps Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-06-10 02:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 17/21] audit: Use timespec64 to represent audit timestamps Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> - 2016-06-10 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 17/21] audit: Use timespec64 to represent audit timestamps Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> - 2016-06-10 03:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 17/21] audit: Use timespec64 to represent audit timestamps Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> - 2016-06-10 02:50 +0200
csiph-web