Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1420058
| From | Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add suspend-to-idle validation for Intel SoCs |
| Date | 2016-06-11 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rIXRf-7IN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rFsAh-1gP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHjVU-8cE-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHzeh-17I-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue 2016-06-07 17:07:21, dbasehore . wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote: > > On Wed 2016-06-01 21:33:24, dbasehore@chromium.org wrote: > >> From: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@chromium.org> > >> > >> This patch set adds support for catching errors when entering freeze > >> on Intel Skylake SoCs. Support for this can be added to newer SoCs in > >> later patches. > >> > >> Verification is done by waking up the CPU once every X (default 10) > >> seconds to check the residency of S0ix. This can't be verified before > >> attempting to enter S0ix through mwait, so we have to repeatedly > >> verify entry into that state. Successfully entering S0ix is no > >> guarantee that it will be entered on the next attempt, so we have to > >> schedule another check. This has a minimal power impact of <1% of the > >> total system power on our systems. > > > > Dunno. Should this be protected with something like CONFIG_TEST_SLEEP? > > People probably don't want this for production... > > > > That depends, if you switch to using suspend to idle instead of > suspend to RAM, would you rather not catch power bugs due to > misconfigured hardware in production? > I agree that it shouldn't be on by default since freeze shouldn't fail > because some IP on the SoC doesn't have firmware loaded (this happens > with i915), but I was just going to leave it off by default instead of > adding yet another config option for a small feature. I'd rather have testing features optional. In 2 years, hopefully the drivers are debugged, and people can set this to off... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/5] Add suspend-to-idle validation for Intel SoCs dbasehore@chromium.org - 2016-06-02 06:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add suspend-to-idle validation for Intel SoCs Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-06-07 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add suspend-to-idle validation for Intel SoCs "dbasehore ." <dbasehore@chromium.org> - 2016-06-08 02:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add suspend-to-idle validation for Intel SoCs Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-06-11 22:40 +0200
csiph-web