Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1418379
| From | Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] drivers: psci: refactor psci_cpu_init_idle in preparation for ACPI LPI support |
| Date | 2016-06-09 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rI985-7ym-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rpD6G-6Tc-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rpD6H-6Tc-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <rI8c2-6Vc-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | ARM |
On 09/06/16 14:24, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:30:11PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Inorder to accomodate bot DT and ACPI LPI support in psci_cpu_init_idle,
>> move the device tree specific into psci_dt_cpu_init_idle.
>>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/firmware/psci.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
>> index 11bfee8b79a9..af6c5c839568 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
>> @@ -250,11 +250,11 @@ static int __init psci_features(u32 psci_func_id)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
>> static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u32 *, psci_power_state);
>>
>> -static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
>> +static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu)
>
> Unfortunately you would break ARM 32-bit if you did that.
>
Ah right, I failed to catch this. Thanks for spotting this.
[...]
>> int psci_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *cpu_node;
>> - int ret;
>> -
>> - cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
>> - if (!cpu_node)
>> - return -ENODEV;
>> -
>> - ret = psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(cpu_node, cpu);
>> -
>> - of_node_put(cpu_node);
>> -
>> - return ret;
>> + return psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(cpu);
>
> How about leaving code as is and you wrap the cpu_node retrieval:
>
> if (!acpi_disabled) {
> acpi_idle_init();
> } else {
> cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> if (!cpu_node)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> ret = psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(cpu_node, cpu);
>
> of_node_put(cpu_node);
> }
>
> ?
>
> Alternatively, you could create an intermediate stub
> __psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(), that will be used for CONFIG_ARM
> cpuidle_ops.init and psci_dt_cpu_init_idle() after retrieving
> the cpu_node, which I think is slightly cleaner.
>
I like this approach more.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] drivers: psci: refactor psci_cpu_init_idle in preparation for ACPI LPI support Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2016-06-09 15:30 +0200 Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] drivers: psci: refactor psci_cpu_init_idle in preparation for ACPI LPI support Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-09 16:30 +0200
csiph-web