Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1416095

Re: about definition of iowait

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: about definition of iowait
Date 2016-06-07 14:10 +0200
Message-ID <rHnZv-2wN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rHnd9-1YN-49@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 07:24:46PM +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I noticed some problems about iowait entry of /proc/stat: it seems not
> accurate, and sometimes will decrease in SMP.
> 
> For UP, we have a simple definition about iowait, which is:
> The time that the processor is idle, during which there is a task waiting
> for I/O.
> 
> This definition seems don't fit well when step into SMP era, so I think
> maybe it can be extended like:
> For a given CPU, the I/O wait time is the time during which that CPU was
> idle, and there is at least one outstanding disk I/O operation requested by
> a task scheduled on that CPU.
> 
> But tasks can migrate among cpus, so this definition maybe not accurate.
> 
> I also saw some suggestions that it should be a global value, not per cpu,
> but don`t see clear definition, so anyone have suggestions about it?
> (personally guessing, maybe: there is task waiting for outstanding I/O while
> all cpus are idle? But I don't think it is good...)

It is possible to come up with definition for a single global number;
per-cpu iowait numbers are doomed.

But I don't see it matters one way or the other. Personally I would just
make the kernel return 0 and be done with it.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

about definition of iowait Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2016-06-07 13:20 +0200
  Re: about definition of iowait Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-07 14:10 +0200
    Re: about definition of iowait Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2016-06-08 09:10 +0200

csiph-web