Re: [PATCH 09/16] sched/fair: Let asymmetric cpu configurations balance at wake-up

From	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 09/16] sched/fair: Let asymmetric cpu configurations balance at wake-up
Date	2016-06-08 16:40 +0200
Message-ID	<rHMOe-1mm-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rBVKx-4Lf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rBVKz-4Lf-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFBNg-71V-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHJQm-7Xe-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 12:29:52PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> Let's take your example above and add that t0 should really be running
> on cpu2/3 due to its utilization, assuming SD1[01] are little cpus and
> SD1[23] are big cpus. In that case we would still do affine-wakeup and
> stick the task on cpu0 despite it being a little cpu.

Ah indeed.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 09/16] sched/fair: Let asymmetric cpu configurations  balance at wake-up Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-02 16:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 09/16] sched/fair: Let asymmetric cpu configurations  balance at wake-up Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2016-06-08 13:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 09/16] sched/fair: Let asymmetric cpu configurations  balance at wake-up Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-08 16:40 +0200

csiph-web